On the forced mobilization of Metropolitan Serhiy of Tulchyn
Metropolitan Serhiy of Tulchyn. Photo: Metropolitan's Facebook page
The incident with the "busification" of Metropolitan Serhiy (Anitsoi) of Tulchyn takes the issue of the forced mobilization of UOC clergy to a new level.
1. TRC officers have previously abducted a bishop of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, but that was a vicar bishop – Bishop Seraphim of Novovorontsovka. Metropolitan Serhiy, however, is the ruling hierarch of the Tulchyn Eparchy. If he cannot be released, the Tulchyn see will effectively be left vacant – even though the hierarch is alive and has committed no canonical offense.
A situation in which a ruling hierarch is unable to perform his duties because he has been taken into the army is virtually unprecedented in world Orthodoxy. Nothing like this happened in Church history even during the Soviet persecutions.
2. The TRC’s actions toward Metropolitan Serhiy are absurd because he is… not a Ukrainian citizen. In December 2022, Zelensky issued a secret decree stripping 13 UOC hierarchs of Ukrainian citizenship, including then-Bishop Serhiy. Like the other hierarchs, he tried to challenge the decree in court, but without success.
Thus, TRC officers abducted a metropolitan whom the state itself had renounced. How can he be expected to defend a country whose citizen he is not?
The question would seem rhetorical.
But not in Ukraine.
Read also
Portrait of the “сonscience of the nation”
Shevchuk waxes eloquent about the uniqueness of the Ukrainian nation and the value of human life – while supporting the sweeping mobilization that is grinding that very nation down.
OCU in the Lavra: When a recording replaces the choir
Parishioners have been pushed out of the Lavra. The monks are barred from the churches. But there is room for a handful of OCU “monks.”
Sviatohirsk murder no one is allowed to talk about
Logic suggests that Zelensky was informed about the monk’s murder that very day.
Sviatohirsk Lavra tragedy: A confession of faith or not?
The killers came to the monastery and, after hearing the words “Glory to our Lord God” in response, began to kill. What matters is that the victims were given a choice: they could give the “right” answer and escape death.
Have the talking points on the Sviatohirsk murder already been rolled out?
Espreso gives viewers the unmistakable impression that nothing particularly terrible happened – and that no one should feel too sorry for the “Moscow Patriarchate monks.”
Why are a rabbi and an exarch pleading for corruption suspects?
The rabbi and the exarch are both highly intelligent men and cannot fail to understand that their actions are dealing a serious blow to their reputations. Yet they still went to court. Why?