The veiled Lavra
Dumenko in front of the veiled icon of the Dormition Cathedral. Photo: OCU
Everyone remembers the photos from the Lavra’s Refectory Church, where huge screens displaying images of Zelensky were placed in front of the icons of the Venerable Fathers of the Caves.
On August 15, 2026, the authorities staged a lavish celebration of the monastery’s 975th anniversary. And history repeated itself. Only this time, instead of screens, the icons were covered with fabric bearing the anniversary numbers.
There is nothing surprising about the fact that this did not trouble Zelensky as he delivered a speech in what he called “a place of Ukraine’s spiritual strength.” What is sad is that OCU head Serhiy Dumenko showed no reaction either. Standing against the backdrop of a veiled icon of the Baptism of the Lord, he delivered an emotional speech claiming that, through the efforts of Zelensky and the OCU, the Lavra is “breaking free from the shackles of the Russian World and returning to its roots.”
We can all see what this “return to its roots” looks like: believers and monks driven out, the monastery turned into a venue for concerts, symposiums and festive events. Just like a hundred years ago.
That is why the covered icon has become a symbol of what is happening to Orthodoxy – both in the Lavra and across the country.
Faith in Ukraine has not disappeared. It has simply been hidden from view – veiled.
Read also
Portrait of the “сonscience of the nation”
Shevchuk waxes eloquent about the uniqueness of the Ukrainian nation and the value of human life – while supporting the sweeping mobilization that is grinding that very nation down.
OCU in the Lavra: When a recording replaces the choir
Parishioners have been pushed out of the Lavra. The monks are barred from the churches. But there is room for a handful of OCU “monks.”
Sviatohirsk murder no one is allowed to talk about
Logic suggests that Zelensky was informed about the monk’s murder that very day.
Sviatohirsk Lavra tragedy: A confession of faith or not?
The killers came to the monastery and, after hearing the words “Glory to our Lord God” in response, began to kill. What matters is that the victims were given a choice: they could give the “right” answer and escape death.
Have the talking points on the Sviatohirsk murder already been rolled out?
Espreso gives viewers the unmistakable impression that nothing particularly terrible happened – and that no one should feel too sorry for the “Moscow Patriarchate monks.”
Why are a rabbi and an exarch pleading for corruption suspects?
The rabbi and the exarch are both highly intelligent men and cannot fail to understand that their actions are dealing a serious blow to their reputations. Yet they still went to court. Why?