FSB officer faces charges – and an inconvenient detail from his past
An officer of Ukraine's Foreign Intelligence Service defected to the FSB. Photo: FISU Press Service
“Patriotic” media outlets and Telegram channels have widely circulated the news that the SBU has charged FSB officer S. Havrysh over the persecution of two OCU clerics in the occupied part of Donbas. According to investigators, Havrysh forced them to re-register their churches under Russian law and helped send them to a temporary detention center for foreign nationals, from where they were deported to Georgia.
Religious persecution, if it did indeed take place, is unquestionably unacceptable. But there is another detail worth noting. Until 2014, Havrysh was an officer of Ukraine’s Foreign Intelligence Service – meaning that after the occupation, he became a traitor. And there were many like him.
Lavra attorney Fr Nikita Chekman has said that around 98% of Ukrainian security-service personnel in Crimea defected to Russia. Yet here is the paradox: no one in Ukraine calls the SBU or the Foreign Intelligence Service institutions of traitors.
When it comes to UOC clergy, however, the approach is somehow entirely different. Isolated criminal cases involving less than 1% of the clergy are solemnly portrayed by the authorities and the media as a threat to national security – and used as grounds for seeking to ban the entire Church.
Yet another reason to take pride in our unprecedented freedom of religion.
Read also
Portrait of the “сonscience of the nation”
Shevchuk waxes eloquent about the uniqueness of the Ukrainian nation and the value of human life – while supporting the sweeping mobilization that is grinding that very nation down.
OCU in the Lavra: When a recording replaces the choir
Parishioners have been pushed out of the Lavra. The monks are barred from the churches. But there is room for a handful of OCU “monks.”
Sviatohirsk murder no one is allowed to talk about
Logic suggests that Zelensky was informed about the monk’s murder that very day.
Sviatohirsk Lavra tragedy: A confession of faith or not?
The killers came to the monastery and, after hearing the words “Glory to our Lord God” in response, began to kill. What matters is that the victims were given a choice: they could give the “right” answer and escape death.
Have the talking points on the Sviatohirsk murder already been rolled out?
Espreso gives viewers the unmistakable impression that nothing particularly terrible happened – and that no one should feel too sorry for the “Moscow Patriarchate monks.”
Why are a rabbi and an exarch pleading for corruption suspects?
The rabbi and the exarch are both highly intelligent men and cannot fail to understand that their actions are dealing a serious blow to their reputations. Yet they still went to court. Why?