Ten years after the Great Cross Procession: faith through trial
All-Ukrainian Cross Procession 2016. Photo: UOJ
On July 27, 2016, exactly ten years ago, the All-Ukrainian Cross Procession for Peace reached its destination in Kyiv. For nearly a month, two columns of pilgrims – one from the Sviatohirsk Lavra and the other from the Pochaiv Lavra – crossed the country before joining together in prayer on Volodymyr Hill.
Even then, the pilgrimage faced serious obstacles. Pilgrims were blocked from entering cities, bomb threats were reported along their route, and radical groups were incited against them.
Yet they reached Kyiv.
Eighty thousand faithful processed through the heart of the capital to the Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra. Together with those waiting at the monastery's gates, the gathering numbered close to 100,000 believers.
Today, those images evoke mixed emotions. The Lavra has been taken away, religious processions have been effectively banned, and the Church is facing persecution.
Yet Christ told us: "Fear not, little flock, for it is your Father's good pleasure to give you the Kingdom" (Luke 12:32).
And we should remember that the sun continues to shine even above the darkest clouds.
"We shall behold Christ, the Sun of Righteousness, Who shines forth life upon all."
Read also
Portrait of the “сonscience of the nation”
Shevchuk waxes eloquent about the uniqueness of the Ukrainian nation and the value of human life – while supporting the sweeping mobilization that is grinding that very nation down.
OCU in the Lavra: When a recording replaces the choir
Parishioners have been pushed out of the Lavra. The monks are barred from the churches. But there is room for a handful of OCU “monks.”
Sviatohirsk murder no one is allowed to talk about
Logic suggests that Zelensky was informed about the monk’s murder that very day.
Sviatohirsk Lavra tragedy: A confession of faith or not?
The killers came to the monastery and, after hearing the words “Glory to our Lord God” in response, began to kill. What matters is that the victims were given a choice: they could give the “right” answer and escape death.
Have the talking points on the Sviatohirsk murder already been rolled out?
Espreso gives viewers the unmistakable impression that nothing particularly terrible happened – and that no one should feel too sorry for the “Moscow Patriarchate monks.”
Why are a rabbi and an exarch pleading for corruption suspects?
The rabbi and the exarch are both highly intelligent men and cannot fail to understand that their actions are dealing a serious blow to their reputations. Yet they still went to court. Why?