Why the Lavra’s patronal feast passed in silence
Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra. Photo: Lavra Reserve
May 3 marks one of the principal feasts of the Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra – the commemoration of St. Theodosius, a founder and spiritual pillar of the monastery. In the UOC, it is observed on May 16 due to the calendar difference. Traditionally, this day filled the Lavra with prayer, crowds, and solemn services.
This year, however, the feast passed almost unnoticed in the “OCU Lavra.” There is no trace of any celebration on the organization’s official platforms. On a day that should stand at the heart of the monastery’s liturgical life, there was silence.
Instead of honoring the saint, the “OCU abbot” Avraamiy Lotysh left for Khmelnytskyi, where Serhiy Dumenko was visiting.
The irony is striking. Not long ago, by decision of the OCU synod, monks from the Theodosius Monastery were relocated to the Lavra. If anyone should have marked this feast, it was them.
Yet the pattern remains unchanged: the Lavra appears active only in the presence of Dumenko. Without him, there are not only no crowds – there is no worship. And on the day dedicated to one of its founding saints, even its own “abbot” was nowhere to be found.
Read also
Portrait of the “сonscience of the nation”
Shevchuk waxes eloquent about the uniqueness of the Ukrainian nation and the value of human life – while supporting the sweeping mobilization that is grinding that very nation down.
OCU in the Lavra: When a recording replaces the choir
Parishioners have been pushed out of the Lavra. The monks are barred from the churches. But there is room for a handful of OCU “monks.”
Sviatohirsk murder no one is allowed to talk about
Logic suggests that Zelensky was informed about the monk’s murder that very day.
Sviatohirsk Lavra tragedy: A confession of faith or not?
The killers came to the monastery and, after hearing the words “Glory to our Lord God” in response, began to kill. What matters is that the victims were given a choice: they could give the “right” answer and escape death.
Have the talking points on the Sviatohirsk murder already been rolled out?
Espreso gives viewers the unmistakable impression that nothing particularly terrible happened – and that no one should feel too sorry for the “Moscow Patriarchate monks.”
Why are a rabbi and an exarch pleading for corruption suspects?
The rabbi and the exarch are both highly intelligent men and cannot fail to understand that their actions are dealing a serious blow to their reputations. Yet they still went to court. Why?