116 agreements with the aggressor in year five of war: Who must “sever ties”?
Photo caption: Zelensky at the Phanar. Photo: Anadolu Agency
Foreign Minister Sybiha declared – with great fanfare – that 116 (!) documents are being scrapped.
In other words, after more than four years of a bloody war, Ukraine still maintained active legal relations with the aggressor state. And the very same officials who, all this time, turned a blind eye to these ongoing ties with Russia were simultaneously demanding – with indignation – that the Ukrainian Orthodox Church sever its supposed “connections” with the Russian Orthodox Church, connections whose very nature they scarcely understand.
President Volodymyr Zelensky himself, with a grave expression, repeatedly claimed that the UOC maintains “legal ties” with the Moscow Patriarchate. Government officials on ethnopolitics, having pored over the charter of the Russian Orthodox Church, now insist that the Ukrainian Orthodox Church must somehow “eliminate” and “break” certain provisions. The country’s leadership continues to speak insistently about the need for “spiritual independence.”
But how can those in power presume to issue demands in the spiritual sphere when they have yet to put their own house in order? When, even during wartime, those closest to them were allegedly funneling money to Moscow? When high-ranking officials have stolen – or continue to steal – staggering sums from their own people?
Or was the entire media storm around the UOC nothing more than a smokescreen?
Read also
Portrait of the “сonscience of the nation”
Shevchuk waxes eloquent about the uniqueness of the Ukrainian nation and the value of human life – while supporting the sweeping mobilization that is grinding that very nation down.
OCU in the Lavra: When a recording replaces the choir
Parishioners have been pushed out of the Lavra. The monks are barred from the churches. But there is room for a handful of OCU “monks.”
Sviatohirsk murder no one is allowed to talk about
Logic suggests that Zelensky was informed about the monk’s murder that very day.
Sviatohirsk Lavra tragedy: A confession of faith or not?
The killers came to the monastery and, after hearing the words “Glory to our Lord God” in response, began to kill. What matters is that the victims were given a choice: they could give the “right” answer and escape death.
Have the talking points on the Sviatohirsk murder already been rolled out?
Espreso gives viewers the unmistakable impression that nothing particularly terrible happened – and that no one should feel too sorry for the “Moscow Patriarchate monks.”
Why are a rabbi and an exarch pleading for corruption suspects?
The rabbi and the exarch are both highly intelligent men and cannot fail to understand that their actions are dealing a serious blow to their reputations. Yet they still went to court. Why?