Was a UOC сhurch in Ivano-Frankivsk demolished for the sake of a park?
The Transfiguration Church of the UOC in Ivano-Frankivsk before it was demolished by the authorities. Photo: Halka
Until 2022, this was the site of the UOC’s Transfiguration Church. After years of litigation and international scandal – including condemnation of the demolition by the UN Human Rights Committee – the city authorities nevertheless ordered the church torn down. Their official excuse was an allegedly acute shortage of kindergarten places. The public was assured that a new kindergarten would promptly rise on the ruins of the church.
The church was demolished in February 2022. No one, however, rushed to build anything. What remained was a trash-strewn wasteland. Then, in 2024, a new idea suddenly appeared – a school.
“At Chornovola, we have a plot of land that the community won through the courts from the Moscow Patriarchate. And now we want to have a primary school there,” Mayor Martsinkiv declared at the time. “That is why we announced an investment tender for the construction of an educational institution for the community, so that children would have the opportunity to study.”
But another two years have passed, and now it has emerged that no school will be built there either. The latest plan is to turn the site of the demolished church into a “memorial park.”
And all of this demonstrates one thing with perfect clarity: the UOC church was not demolished because the city needed the land. More than four years have gone by, and nothing has been built there. The church was razed for one reason only – so that it would no longer exist. Other actions by the authorities confirm exactly the same point.
A year after the destruction of the Transfiguration Church, the city’s last remaining UOC church – its cathedral – was seized by force. At the time, Martsinkiv openly boasted that Ivano-Frankivsk region had become the first region without the UOC:
“It was the last church in Ivano-Frankivsk region belonging to the UOC of the Moscow Patriarchate. We worked toward this event for a long time and today showed a good example for the whole country. <…> I wish for our entire independent state to be cleansed of the Moscow Patriarchate.”
Yet another shining exhibit of Ukraine’s “model freedom of religion.” And anyone who objects, of course, is a Kremlin agent.
Read also
Portrait of the “сonscience of the nation”
Shevchuk waxes eloquent about the uniqueness of the Ukrainian nation and the value of human life – while supporting the sweeping mobilization that is grinding that very nation down.
OCU in the Lavra: When a recording replaces the choir
Parishioners have been pushed out of the Lavra. The monks are barred from the churches. But there is room for a handful of OCU “monks.”
Sviatohirsk murder no one is allowed to talk about
Logic suggests that Zelensky was informed about the monk’s murder that very day.
Sviatohirsk Lavra tragedy: A confession of faith or not?
The killers came to the monastery and, after hearing the words “Glory to our Lord God” in response, began to kill. What matters is that the victims were given a choice: they could give the “right” answer and escape death.
Have the talking points on the Sviatohirsk murder already been rolled out?
Espreso gives viewers the unmistakable impression that nothing particularly terrible happened – and that no one should feel too sorry for the “Moscow Patriarchate monks.”
Why are a rabbi and an exarch pleading for corruption suspects?
The rabbi and the exarch are both highly intelligent men and cannot fail to understand that their actions are dealing a serious blow to their reputations. Yet they still went to court. Why?