Who terrifies the authorities more: A murderous shepherd or a righteous one?
Metropolitan Arseniy in an ambulance. Photo: Sviatohirsk Lavra
On November 3, the Dnipro court once again returned Metropolitan Arseniy of Sviatohirsk to the pre-trial detention center. According to the statement of the Prosecutor General’s Office, it was “for crimes against peace.” More precisely – for a “wrong” sermon.
The hierarch was thrown behind bars without the right to bail, despite having already spent a year and a half in prison for nothing. Despite suffering from serious health problems – on the very day of the hearing, an ambulance had to take him to the hospital.
That same day, November 3, in Truskavets, a Uniate (UGCC) priest, Volodymyr Luzhetsky, killed a man in a drunk-driving accident. Like Metropolitan Arseniy, Luzhetsky was placed in pre-trial detention. But there is a nuance – he can walk free as soon as he pays bail: 242,000 hryvnias.
And so what do we have?
A clergyman of one confession, who during deadly shelling never abandoned the Lavra and cared for hundreds of refugees, sits behind bars under absurd accusations. He has been prescribed urgent heart surgery – but he cannot leave the detention center.
A clergyman of another confession has killed a man – yet he can walk free at any moment for six thousand dollars.
We by no means wish Luzhetsky harm; prison is always a terrible thing.
But the contrast in how the authorities treat them is simply too striking to ignore.
Read also
Portrait of the “сonscience of the nation”
Shevchuk waxes eloquent about the uniqueness of the Ukrainian nation and the value of human life – while supporting the sweeping mobilization that is grinding that very nation down.
OCU in the Lavra: When a recording replaces the choir
Parishioners have been pushed out of the Lavra. The monks are barred from the churches. But there is room for a handful of OCU “monks.”
Sviatohirsk murder no one is allowed to talk about
Logic suggests that Zelensky was informed about the monk’s murder that very day.
Sviatohirsk Lavra tragedy: A confession of faith or not?
The killers came to the monastery and, after hearing the words “Glory to our Lord God” in response, began to kill. What matters is that the victims were given a choice: they could give the “right” answer and escape death.
Have the talking points on the Sviatohirsk murder already been rolled out?
Espreso gives viewers the unmistakable impression that nothing particularly terrible happened – and that no one should feel too sorry for the “Moscow Patriarchate monks.”
Why are a rabbi and an exarch pleading for corruption suspects?
The rabbi and the exarch are both highly intelligent men and cannot fail to understand that their actions are dealing a serious blow to their reputations. Yet they still went to court. Why?