Patriarch Bartholomew: Despite the Tomos, Ukrainians must unite once again
Patriarch Bartholomew. Photo: French television
The Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople gave a landmark interview to French television. At first glance, his stance on Ukraine seemed unchanged – he refused to revoke the Tomos. Yet much in his tone and message has indeed shifted.
1️⃣. Whereas he once declared that the OCU had united all Orthodox Ukrainians, for the first time he publicly admitted that the Tomos brought no unity. He did not dispute the interviewer’s statement that two parallel jurisdictions exist in Ukraine – the UOC and the OCU.
2️⃣. In 2019, Patriarch Bartholomew officially stated that he was “temporarily tolerating the existence of Ukrainian hierarchs (i.e. the UOC – Ed.) not as ruling bishops, but merely as titulars, or as hierarchs of the Russian Church residing in Ukraine.” Now he effectively acknowledges that the UOC, under Metropolitan Onuphry, truly exists. Consequently, both its Primate and all its bishops are no mere “titulars.”
3️⃣. In a statement that borders on irony, the Patriarch proclaimed a new “goal” for Constantinople in Ukraine: “Our goal is to unite all the Orthodox Churches of Ukraine: both Metropolitan Onuphry and Metropolitan Epiphany, so that they may be united not only in theory, but in practice.”
4️⃣. Most striking of all: Bartholomew now speaks of recognition of Ukrainian autocephaly by the Local Churches not in the context of the OCU, but of some future united Church comprising both the UOC and the OCU.
And whereas the Phanar initially claimed that recognition would take only months, the Patriarch now speaks in the language of decades: “I believe that with God’s grace and the goodwill of the sister Orthodox Churches, this will happen in the coming years or decades.”
The one point on which Bartholomew remains unyielding is his claim to the status of “first without equals.” Neither he nor his successors, he insists, will ever renounce their command over Orthodoxy.
Read also
Portrait of the “сonscience of the nation”
Shevchuk waxes eloquent about the uniqueness of the Ukrainian nation and the value of human life – while supporting the sweeping mobilization that is grinding that very nation down.
OCU in the Lavra: When a recording replaces the choir
Parishioners have been pushed out of the Lavra. The monks are barred from the churches. But there is room for a handful of OCU “monks.”
Sviatohirsk murder no one is allowed to talk about
Logic suggests that Zelensky was informed about the monk’s murder that very day.
Sviatohirsk Lavra tragedy: A confession of faith or not?
The killers came to the monastery and, after hearing the words “Glory to our Lord God” in response, began to kill. What matters is that the victims were given a choice: they could give the “right” answer and escape death.
Have the talking points on the Sviatohirsk murder already been rolled out?
Espreso gives viewers the unmistakable impression that nothing particularly terrible happened – and that no one should feel too sorry for the “Moscow Patriarchate monks.”
Why are a rabbi and an exarch pleading for corruption suspects?
The rabbi and the exarch are both highly intelligent men and cannot fail to understand that their actions are dealing a serious blow to their reputations. Yet they still went to court. Why?