Does the state now decide who is depicted on church frescoes?

Frescoes in the Dormition Cathedral. Photo: Ukrinform

First came the photos and videos of reserve staff hauling the reliquaries with the relics of the Venerable Fathers of the Caves out of the catacombs and performing strange manipulations with them. Then followed an image showing those same reliquaries dumped on the floor in some corridor, alongside banana crates and half-finished coffee cups.

And now, the head of the reserve, Kotliarevska, has made a shocking announcement: as part of “derussification,” a number of frescoes in the Dormition Cathedral will be destroyed and replaced with new ones. She made it clear that the “derussification” would target frescoes depicting Metropolitan Onuphry, the late Metropolitan Volodymyr (the reposed primate of the UOC), and the Lavra’s abbot, Metropolitan Pavel. We will not ask what connection these hierarchs – all of them ethnic Ukrainians – are supposed to have with Russia. Let us note something else.

According to Kotliarevska, it will be a “scientific council” that decides who exactly will be painted on the frescoes of the Dormition Cathedral. In other words, people with no relation to the Church whatsoever.

First the museum workers rummage through the reliquaries of the Venerable Fathers, and now they presume to dictate how the churches should be painted. What comes next? Will the Ministry of Culture staff appoint whom to canonize and whom not? Will they instruct the Church whom to commemorate at the Great Entrance?

Although, one suspects that for Dumenko, as for the Ministry of Culture, the answer will always be nothing but a resounding “yes.”

Read also

Portrait of the “сonscience of the nation”

Shevchuk waxes eloquent about the uniqueness of the Ukrainian nation and the value of human life – while supporting the sweeping mobilization that is grinding that very nation down.

OCU in the Lavra: When a recording replaces the choir

Parishioners have been pushed out of the Lavra. The monks are barred from the churches. But there is room for a handful of OCU “monks.”

Sviatohirsk murder no one is allowed to talk about

Logic suggests that Zelensky was informed about the monk’s murder that very day.

Sviatohirsk Lavra tragedy: A confession of faith or not?

The killers came to the monastery and, after hearing the words “Glory to our Lord God” in response, began to kill. What matters is that the victims were given a choice: they could give the “right” answer and escape death.

Have the talking points on the Sviatohirsk murder already been rolled out?

Espreso gives viewers the unmistakable impression that nothing particularly terrible happened – and that no one should feel too sorry for the “Moscow Patriarchate monks.”

Why are a rabbi and an exarch pleading for corruption suspects?

The rabbi and the exarch are both highly intelligent men and cannot fail to understand that their actions are dealing a serious blow to their reputations. Yet they still went to court. Why?