What citizenship remains when you’re stripped of Ukrainian?

Metropolitan Onuphry. Photo: UOJ

From a legal perspective, this is outright lawlessness.

Politically speaking, the authorities have taken yet another significant step toward catastrophe for our country. Working so zealously to destroy the state and inflame division in society can only serve the interests of its enemies. Let’s not try to predict exactly how today’s decision by Zelensky will come back to haunt our country in the end. But haunt us it certainly will. The authorities think they have struck a blow against the Church of Christ. In reality, they have struck a blow against Ukraine – and against themselves.

But what about the spiritual perspective? What spiritual meaning lies behind all this? Let us recall the righteous Job. To an outside observer, he simply suffered one disaster after another. Terrible calamities. One after another. But we know what was really happening beyond our visible world. We know how the devil doubted Job’s righteousness and asked God for permission to test him.

It seems the meaning of the persecution of the Church and its Primate is this.

There are things that other people or circumstances can take away from you: your property, health, friends, homeland, citizenship. And if, by God’s providence, this happens, the question arises: what remains? Is there anything no one can ever take from you? The Apostle Paul says it is the love of God: “Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? Shall tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or danger, or sword?” (Romans 8:35).

They took away your church building – but do you have the love of God within you? They called you a traitor and a collaborator – but do you have the love of God? They stripped you of earthly citizenship – but do you see yourself as a citizen of the Kingdom of God?

Of course, Volodymyr Zelensky and the other authorities are merely instruments in God’s hands. Through them, we are taught not to cling to what is earthly – it can be taken from us. Not to prize our citizenship too highly – it can be revoked. Not to place our country above all else – we can be cast out of it. But to separate ourselves from the love of God is something only we can do to ourselves.

If someone keeps that love despite everything, they will discover that they have truly lost nothing at all. The story of Job proves this in full measure.

And to the persecutors of the Church, one would like to remind them of the words of the Apocalypse: “Let the evildoer still do evil, and the filthy still be filthy, and the righteous still do right, and the holy still be holy. Behold, I am coming soon, bringing my recompense with me, to repay everyone for what he has done” (Revelation 22:11–12).

Read also

Portrait of the “сonscience of the nation”

Shevchuk waxes eloquent about the uniqueness of the Ukrainian nation and the value of human life – while supporting the sweeping mobilization that is grinding that very nation down.

OCU in the Lavra: When a recording replaces the choir

Parishioners have been pushed out of the Lavra. The monks are barred from the churches. But there is room for a handful of OCU “monks.”

Sviatohirsk murder no one is allowed to talk about

Logic suggests that Zelensky was informed about the monk’s murder that very day.

Sviatohirsk Lavra tragedy: A confession of faith or not?

The killers came to the monastery and, after hearing the words “Glory to our Lord God” in response, began to kill. What matters is that the victims were given a choice: they could give the “right” answer and escape death.

Have the talking points on the Sviatohirsk murder already been rolled out?

Espreso gives viewers the unmistakable impression that nothing particularly terrible happened – and that no one should feel too sorry for the “Moscow Patriarchate monks.”

Why are a rabbi and an exarch pleading for corruption suspects?

The rabbi and the exarch are both highly intelligent men and cannot fail to understand that their actions are dealing a serious blow to their reputations. Yet they still went to court. Why?