Which articles of the Constitution should we cross out?
A copy of the “improved” Constitution. Photo: Sens Instagram
Ukraine is celebrating Constitution Day. To mark the occasion, the “Sens” bookstore chain has come up with a truly “brilliant” idea: they’re giving away copies of the Constitution with Article 10 crossed out – the one that protects the Russian language.
“Without a doubt, the Constitution of Ukraine is the fundamental law, a symbol of unity and independence. But we must acknowledge that some of its articles need to be revised and updated,” they write in “Sens.”
Some people might call this stunt discriminatory. But let’s be honest – they’re simply telling the truth as they see it: certain constitutional guarantees no longer fit the new Ukrainian reality. And that’s not just about language.
Let’s take a look at Article 35: “Everyone has the right to freedom of religion. This right includes the freedom to profess any religion, to freely perform religious rites and ceremonies alone or in community, and to conduct religious activities.”
Do believers of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church still enjoy that freedom? Can they freely practice their faith? Hardly everywhere. And if things keep going this way, the state will soon rip that freedom away entirely.
Read further: “The Church and religious organizations in Ukraine are separated from the state.” Really? Isn’t the government actively banning the UOC? Doesn’t it expel its communities from churches to hand them over to the OCU? Doesn’t it pressure other Local Churches to recognize its favorite? Doesn’t it treat the OCU as a state “attribute”? The answer is plain: yes.
So here’s our proposal to “Sens”: improve your initiative! Don’t stop at crossing out Article 10 – strike out Article 35 as well. The President will surely approve. After all, his famous “pause” on religious persecution has become a punchline already.
Read also
Portrait of the “сonscience of the nation”
Shevchuk waxes eloquent about the uniqueness of the Ukrainian nation and the value of human life – while supporting the sweeping mobilization that is grinding that very nation down.
OCU in the Lavra: When a recording replaces the choir
Parishioners have been pushed out of the Lavra. The monks are barred from the churches. But there is room for a handful of OCU “monks.”
Sviatohirsk murder no one is allowed to talk about
Logic suggests that Zelensky was informed about the monk’s murder that very day.
Sviatohirsk Lavra tragedy: A confession of faith or not?
The killers came to the monastery and, after hearing the words “Glory to our Lord God” in response, began to kill. What matters is that the victims were given a choice: they could give the “right” answer and escape death.
Have the talking points on the Sviatohirsk murder already been rolled out?
Espreso gives viewers the unmistakable impression that nothing particularly terrible happened – and that no one should feel too sorry for the “Moscow Patriarchate monks.”
Why are a rabbi and an exarch pleading for corruption suspects?
The rabbi and the exarch are both highly intelligent men and cannot fail to understand that their actions are dealing a serious blow to their reputations. Yet they still went to court. Why?