OCU: To steal and seize

In Zabolottia, chaplains and men in camouflage beat one of the parishioners. Photo: UOJ

In recent months, the epicenter of church seizures targeting the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC) has shifted to Bukovina. Nearly every week, in one village or another, we witness attacks and violence orchestrated by the same traveling "chaplain corps" of OCU clergy, led by Roman Hryshchuk. Sometimes they are reinforced by radical militants from the Ivano-Frankivsk region. Lately, however, even these aren’t needed – the police now provide the muscle for church raids.

The scheme is always the same.

Stage One: The "chaplain corps" arrives in a village with a crowd to stage a vote on transferring the local church to the OCU. Sometimes they manage to find a few local supporters – a dozen or two – but often they rely entirely on outsiders. The real parish community is barred from the vote.

Stage Two: Forged documents concerning the supposed "transfer" are handed over to corrupt registrars, who promptly re-register the parish under the OCU.

Stage Three: The “chaplains” launch a violent assault or break in during the night – depending on the local UOC community’s resistance.

And here one has to wonder – what does any of this have to do with the law?

By law, it is the members of a specific church community – those who regularly confess, commune, and participate in parish life – who gather and decide whether or not to change jurisdiction.

But in video footage from villages across Bukovina (and beyond), we see a very different picture: parishioners defending their church from complete outsiders, who arrive with angle grinders, knives, bolt cutters, crowbars, and other tools, attempting to force entry into churches to which they have absolutely no connection.

Clergy – or at least, people in cassocks – are seen punching and kicking believers, throwing them to the ground, and engaging in other acts of violence utterly unthinkable for anyone claiming to be a clergyman.

Were it not for today’s political climate, we might say outright that these individuals have nothing to do with the priesthood – they are simply thugs and street gangs in robes. But given that even a sidelong glance at the OCU can now result in treason charges, we will refrain.

On the other hand, it may be appropriate here to recall Richard Patterson’s famous “duck test”:
“If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck – then it probably is a duck.”

Read also

Portrait of the “сonscience of the nation”

Shevchuk waxes eloquent about the uniqueness of the Ukrainian nation and the value of human life – while supporting the sweeping mobilization that is grinding that very nation down.

OCU in the Lavra: When a recording replaces the choir

Parishioners have been pushed out of the Lavra. The monks are barred from the churches. But there is room for a handful of OCU “monks.”

Sviatohirsk murder no one is allowed to talk about

Logic suggests that Zelensky was informed about the monk’s murder that very day.

Sviatohirsk Lavra tragedy: A confession of faith or not?

The killers came to the monastery and, after hearing the words “Glory to our Lord God” in response, began to kill. What matters is that the victims were given a choice: they could give the “right” answer and escape death.

Have the talking points on the Sviatohirsk murder already been rolled out?

Espreso gives viewers the unmistakable impression that nothing particularly terrible happened – and that no one should feel too sorry for the “Moscow Patriarchate monks.”

Why are a rabbi and an exarch pleading for corruption suspects?

The rabbi and the exarch are both highly intelligent men and cannot fail to understand that their actions are dealing a serious blow to their reputations. Yet they still went to court. Why?