What does a priest who breaks down church doors teach?
OCU cleric breaking the gate at the UOC church in Zastavna. Photo: UOJ
Yet another video of a church seizure in Bukovyna. Yet another OCU cleric using a crowbar to personally break through the gate, and then the door of a UOC church.
He leads an enraged crowd, shouting and jeering as they trample, shove, and humiliate elderly female parishioners of the UOC.
And this is not judgment – it is confusion. How can this man, the next day, preach to his parish about Christ’s commandment to love, to forgive, to be at peace? What meaning can such words possibly have, when his actions say something entirely different?
In another village in Bukovyna – Dubivtsi – an OCU priest did exactly the same: after leading a violent church seizure, the very next day he was gently teaching about “goodness and love.”
There may be endless debates over whether members of the OCU have apostolic succession, or whether Patriarch Bartholomew was justified in calling them clergy. But why argue? Words are not the only way we speak. Would we entrust our child to a teacher who swears, and during lessons teaches kids how to steal, rob, and shoot up? Likely not – even if that teacher somehow received a diploma from Harvard or the Sorbonne.
Such a “teacher” will lead a child not to knowledge, but to the gutter – or even prison. So why do we assume different logic applies in the Church?
Read also
Portrait of the “сonscience of the nation”
Shevchuk waxes eloquent about the uniqueness of the Ukrainian nation and the value of human life – while supporting the sweeping mobilization that is grinding that very nation down.
OCU in the Lavra: When a recording replaces the choir
Parishioners have been pushed out of the Lavra. The monks are barred from the churches. But there is room for a handful of OCU “monks.”
Sviatohirsk murder no one is allowed to talk about
Logic suggests that Zelensky was informed about the monk’s murder that very day.
Sviatohirsk Lavra tragedy: A confession of faith or not?
The killers came to the monastery and, after hearing the words “Glory to our Lord God” in response, began to kill. What matters is that the victims were given a choice: they could give the “right” answer and escape death.
Have the talking points on the Sviatohirsk murder already been rolled out?
Espreso gives viewers the unmistakable impression that nothing particularly terrible happened – and that no one should feel too sorry for the “Moscow Patriarchate monks.”
Why are a rabbi and an exarch pleading for corruption suspects?
The rabbi and the exarch are both highly intelligent men and cannot fail to understand that their actions are dealing a serious blow to their reputations. Yet they still went to court. Why?