Why you shouldn’t put a vyshyvanka on your soul

OCU cleric and SBU officers in vyshyvankas. Photo: SBU

On Vyshyvanka Day, Ukraine’s Security Service (SBU) published a photo of the arrest of OCU “priest” and Zoriane village council head Mykhailo Oleinyk, who was caught accepting bribes in a land scheme. Both Oleinyk and the arresting SBU officers were proudly wearing vyshyvankas (embroidered shirts – Ed.). The scene is, at once, comical and sad. Here’s why.

In Ukraine, the vyshyvanka has long ceased to be merely an ethnic garment, like those found in Mexico, Peru, or Norway. Ukrainians are taught that wearing a vyshyvanka connects them to a grand, ancient heritage. It is promoted almost as a sacred “vestment” of a true Ukrainian, the main symbol of “Ukrainian spirituality,” a sign of “light and goodness.”

Children in schools are even asked to write essays on the theme: “Before you put the vyshyvanka on your body, you must put it on your soul.”

Epifaniy Dumenko has claimed that the OCU cannot be imagined without embroidery, suggesting that the colors of the vyshyvanka allegedly carry church symbolism. Thus, only the “worthy,” the true bearers of the “Ukrainian spirit,” are deemed fit to wear it. The “unworthy” are not.

For example, Roman Hryshchuk, a leading church raider in Bukovyna, upon seeing UOC parishioners in vyshyvankas, wrote that their appearance made him not want to wear one anymore. In his view, people who attend the Ukrainian Orthodox Church have no right to wear a vyshyvanka – it should be reserved for the OCU.

Now let us return to Oleinyk and the SBU. This OCU cleric, who also served as a village head, was caught taking bribes as far back as 2016 and has been under investigation ever since. At the time, local OCU “hierarch” Illarion Protsyk said such actions by someone entrusted as a pastor were “unacceptable and inappropriate,” comparing Oleinyk to Judas Iscariot.

Yet despite this, Protsyk has continued to serve liturgies together with this “Judas.” And now Oleinyk has been arrested again – for yet another bribery charge.

But this time, too, Oleinyk was wearing a vyshyvanka.

And the problem isn’t just him or the OCU. On May 15, social media was flooded with grandiose photos of well-fed officials and MPs dressed in vyshyvankas. And it’s doubtful that most of them are any more honest than Oleinyk.

The vyshyvanka is beautiful. It is part of our history. But it is not a “talisman” or a “shield of goodness.” It does not confer some elevated spiritual belonging. It is just clothing.

Christ tells us that this true belonging must be found not on the outside, but within – “The Kingdom of God is within you.”

But that’s hard. It’s easier to just put on a vyshyvanka.

Read also

Portrait of the “сonscience of the nation”

Shevchuk waxes eloquent about the uniqueness of the Ukrainian nation and the value of human life – while supporting the sweeping mobilization that is grinding that very nation down.

OCU in the Lavra: When a recording replaces the choir

Parishioners have been pushed out of the Lavra. The monks are barred from the churches. But there is room for a handful of OCU “monks.”

Sviatohirsk murder no one is allowed to talk about

Logic suggests that Zelensky was informed about the monk’s murder that very day.

Sviatohirsk Lavra tragedy: A confession of faith or not?

The killers came to the monastery and, after hearing the words “Glory to our Lord God” in response, began to kill. What matters is that the victims were given a choice: they could give the “right” answer and escape death.

Have the talking points on the Sviatohirsk murder already been rolled out?

Espreso gives viewers the unmistakable impression that nothing particularly terrible happened – and that no one should feel too sorry for the “Moscow Patriarchate monks.”

Why are a rabbi and an exarch pleading for corruption suspects?

The rabbi and the exarch are both highly intelligent men and cannot fail to understand that their actions are dealing a serious blow to their reputations. Yet they still went to court. Why?