When the persecution of the Church reaches the level of commissars

Police expelled UOC believers in Cherkasy from their St. Andrew’s Church. Photo: UOJ

Usually, the OCU tries to at least create the illusion of legitimacy, gathering some people to pose as "members of a religious community." Even if those "members" are outright thugs who break jaws and shatter the arms and legs of UOC parishioners – as was the case during the seizures of St. Michael's Cathedral and the Nativity of the Mother of God Monastery in Cherkasy.

But today in Cherkasy, the scene was pure surrealism. The police simply drove the parishioners of St. Andrew's Church off the grounds of their own sanctuary and locked the gates. There was not the slightest sign of any alternative "religious community" of the OCU – none at all.

The UOC parishioners were expelled just to expel them, to make sure they simply were not present in the church. And this is despite the fact that St. Andrew's Church is the property of the Cherkasy Eparchy. Legally, there can be no "transition" to the OCU – absolutely none.

One day, historians will look at these images, scratch their heads, and ask, "How was this even possible? How, in an Orthodox democratic country, could believers be thrown out of their church just like that – so brazenly and lawlessly?" And the less attentive history students might even confuse these images with footage from the Bolshevik persecutions.

Although, perhaps not. The "Soviet" footage was in black and white, while the "Ukrainian" is in color. And that’s the only difference.

Read also

Portrait of the “сonscience of the nation”

Shevchuk waxes eloquent about the uniqueness of the Ukrainian nation and the value of human life – while supporting the sweeping mobilization that is grinding that very nation down.

OCU in the Lavra: When a recording replaces the choir

Parishioners have been pushed out of the Lavra. The monks are barred from the churches. But there is room for a handful of OCU “monks.”

Sviatohirsk murder no one is allowed to talk about

Logic suggests that Zelensky was informed about the monk’s murder that very day.

Sviatohirsk Lavra tragedy: A confession of faith or not?

The killers came to the monastery and, after hearing the words “Glory to our Lord God” in response, began to kill. What matters is that the victims were given a choice: they could give the “right” answer and escape death.

Have the talking points on the Sviatohirsk murder already been rolled out?

Espreso gives viewers the unmistakable impression that nothing particularly terrible happened – and that no one should feel too sorry for the “Moscow Patriarchate monks.”

Why are a rabbi and an exarch pleading for corruption suspects?

The rabbi and the exarch are both highly intelligent men and cannot fail to understand that their actions are dealing a serious blow to their reputations. Yet they still went to court. Why?