When the "occupants" build Lavra temples while "Ukrainians" take them away
The Lavra Church of the Life-Giving Spring Icon after being seized by the authorities. Photo: OCU
“The church was rebuilt in the 1990s, adorned with towers and carved pediments. The temple was repainted, and inside, a carved gilded iconostasis was installed,” wrote the OCU.
All of this is fine, but the OCU has no relation whatsoever to the towers, pediments, or iconostasis. The Church of the Life-Giving Spring Icon was rebuilt from Soviet ruins by the efforts of the brotherhood of the Lavra and the parishioners of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC).
After the restoration, daily services were held here. Until August 2024, when the Bolshevik authorities simply expelled the community onto the street to hand over the temple to the OCU. Now it is practically always empty.
The OCU speaks of these events as follows: “This place of prayer gained special significance for Ukrainians last year when the first temple for the military opened here.”
So, you understand: according to the OCU, the church was rebuilt and adorned not by “Ukrainians” but by “Moscow occupants".” This is how the believers and the brotherhood of the Lavra are referred to in various interviews by Dumenko, Lotysh, and other OCU members.
And the Life-Giving Spring temple is a telling example of what is happening to churches both in the Lavra and throughout Ukraine. The “occupants” build and restore churches, while the “Ukrainians” seize and close them. A paradox.
Read also
Portrait of the “сonscience of the nation”
Shevchuk waxes eloquent about the uniqueness of the Ukrainian nation and the value of human life – while supporting the sweeping mobilization that is grinding that very nation down.
OCU in the Lavra: When a recording replaces the choir
Parishioners have been pushed out of the Lavra. The monks are barred from the churches. But there is room for a handful of OCU “monks.”
Sviatohirsk murder no one is allowed to talk about
Logic suggests that Zelensky was informed about the monk’s murder that very day.
Sviatohirsk Lavra tragedy: A confession of faith or not?
The killers came to the monastery and, after hearing the words “Glory to our Lord God” in response, began to kill. What matters is that the victims were given a choice: they could give the “right” answer and escape death.
Have the talking points on the Sviatohirsk murder already been rolled out?
Espreso gives viewers the unmistakable impression that nothing particularly terrible happened – and that no one should feel too sorry for the “Moscow Patriarchate monks.”
Why are a rabbi and an exarch pleading for corruption suspects?
The rabbi and the exarch are both highly intelligent men and cannot fail to understand that their actions are dealing a serious blow to their reputations. Yet they still went to court. Why?