Will UOC believers return from Europe?
Ukrainian refugees in the EU. Photo: DW
Minister of Unity Oleksandr Chernyshov has stated that after the war, he expects 70–75% of Ukrainian refugees in the EU to return. According to him, the success of repatriating the majority will depend on what Ukraine does to facilitate it: “reforms, salary increases, housing solutions, and addressing social issues.”
It seems likely that the minister’s estimate of how many are willing to return is significantly overstated. But that’s not the main point. Beyond salaries, housing, and social support, the “church issue” could be a very substantial factor for many “European” Ukrainians. It is well known that entire regions of the country have already been “cleansed” of the UOC. At the same time, the UOC diaspora in the EU today numbers over a hundred communities.
Perhaps for most migrants, the issue of the Church won’t be decisive in determining whether to return home. But there will certainly be those for whom the ability – or inability – to attend services will be crucial.
Why should they return, for example, to Ivano-Frankivsk, Lviv, or even to Kyiv Region (excluding the capital itself), where there are practically no UOC churches left? Especially when in the EU, they can attend liturgies freely and without interference?
Of course, our officials can continue commissioning public opinion polls showing that no Ukrainians support the UOC. But the reality is quite different.
And if the government truly wants its citizens to return, it must do everything possible to make that happen.
But to be honest, that’s hard to believe. Very hard.
Read also
Portrait of the “сonscience of the nation”
Shevchuk waxes eloquent about the uniqueness of the Ukrainian nation and the value of human life – while supporting the sweeping mobilization that is grinding that very nation down.
OCU in the Lavra: When a recording replaces the choir
Parishioners have been pushed out of the Lavra. The monks are barred from the churches. But there is room for a handful of OCU “monks.”
Sviatohirsk murder no one is allowed to talk about
Logic suggests that Zelensky was informed about the monk’s murder that very day.
Sviatohirsk Lavra tragedy: A confession of faith or not?
The killers came to the monastery and, after hearing the words “Glory to our Lord God” in response, began to kill. What matters is that the victims were given a choice: they could give the “right” answer and escape death.
Have the talking points on the Sviatohirsk murder already been rolled out?
Espreso gives viewers the unmistakable impression that nothing particularly terrible happened – and that no one should feel too sorry for the “Moscow Patriarchate monks.”
Why are a rabbi and an exarch pleading for corruption suspects?
The rabbi and the exarch are both highly intelligent men and cannot fail to understand that their actions are dealing a serious blow to their reputations. Yet they still went to court. Why?