All Ukrainians are equal before SBU, but some are more equal
Roman Hryshchuk. Photo: Facebook / Hryshchuk
Three UOJ journalists are facing life imprisonment, including charges of "inciting interreligious hatred."
As evidence, they are accused of using words like "radicals," "raiders," "OCU members" and placing quotation marks around the clerical titles of OCU members. This is considered "incitement" – and nothing else.
Now, let’s consider one of countless examples from OCU representatives.
Roman Hryshchuk:
"The UOC are occupiers. A hybrid Putin army, sabotage groups, a propaganda machine with 100 generals, 9,000 officers, and 100,000 rank-and-file members… Their tasks are clear and effective: impose the enemy’s narratives, gather and transmit intelligence, identify and compile lists of patriots, sow despair and doubt about the need to resist the occupation."
Does Hryshchuk provide a single piece of evidence for such serious accusations? Of course not. It is pure falsehood and slander. Moreover, it is a self-serving lie, aimed at furthering his own interests.
Hryshchuk is the leader of a group of itinerant activists from Bukovyna, whose purpose is to "transfer" UOC churches to the OCU – essentially stoking conflict in the region. With statements like this, Hryshchuk is preparing the ground for future takeovers, "correctly" influencing those unfamiliar with church matters.
A person listens to a "respected priest," believes him, and then goes to storm a church belonging to "occupiers" and "saboteurs." And just like that –another hotspot of conflict emerges in the country. Is this good for Ukraine or bad? Basic logic suggests it is bad. But at the SBU, it seems they think otherwise.
Because Hryshchuk faces no consequences. So what if he labels 5-6 million people as enemies? So what if he once again pits Ukrainians against each other? (By the way, comments on Hryshchuk’s Facebook page suggest he does this for money.) No, there are no accusations against him.
But there will be accusations against the UOJ when we report on Hryshchuk’s next "heroic" act and those of his associates.
And this is today’s reality of equality before the law in Ukraine.
Read also
Portrait of the “сonscience of the nation”
Shevchuk waxes eloquent about the uniqueness of the Ukrainian nation and the value of human life – while supporting the sweeping mobilization that is grinding that very nation down.
OCU in the Lavra: When a recording replaces the choir
Parishioners have been pushed out of the Lavra. The monks are barred from the churches. But there is room for a handful of OCU “monks.”
Sviatohirsk murder no one is allowed to talk about
Logic suggests that Zelensky was informed about the monk’s murder that very day.
Sviatohirsk Lavra tragedy: A confession of faith or not?
The killers came to the monastery and, after hearing the words “Glory to our Lord God” in response, began to kill. What matters is that the victims were given a choice: they could give the “right” answer and escape death.
Have the talking points on the Sviatohirsk murder already been rolled out?
Espreso gives viewers the unmistakable impression that nothing particularly terrible happened – and that no one should feel too sorry for the “Moscow Patriarchate monks.”
Why are a rabbi and an exarch pleading for corruption suspects?
The rabbi and the exarch are both highly intelligent men and cannot fail to understand that their actions are dealing a serious blow to their reputations. Yet they still went to court. Why?