When star becomes the donkey
Balaam’s Donkey. Photo: Rembrandt's painting
Now that a man who is restoring moral norms in the United States has become president, many believers of the UOC hope that, with the help of his administration, the persecution of their Church will finally stop. And there are some grounds for such hopes, though they are only indirect.
However, strangely enough, we should heed the warning of the spokesperson for the OCU, Ivan (Yevstratiy) Zoria, who, in his usual rude manner, urged UOC parishioners to abandon the “enthusiastic hope that now ‘everything will be returned and everyone will be punished’”. He also mockingly advised us not to “hope on princes” as Trump, claiming that the Phanar has close ties with the new administration and that everything will remain as it was.
Let’s not emphasise that the words “returned and punished” are already a confession: this means that the OCU has taken something, and there is a reason to punish it. The point is different – Zoria, unexpectedly, said the truth: we often place our hopes not in God, but in a “good” politician who will come and protect us.
Five years ago, we similarly expected that Zelensky would correct all the wrongs that Poroshenko had done to the Church. The results are well known. So, the OCU spokesman is right – we should place our hopes only in God. In this case, Zoria (translated into Russian as “Zvezda” (Star)) is worth listening to. He has played the role of Balaam’s donkey, which, by God’s permission, suddenly spoke with a human voice.
Read also
Portrait of the “сonscience of the nation”
Shevchuk waxes eloquent about the uniqueness of the Ukrainian nation and the value of human life – while supporting the sweeping mobilization that is grinding that very nation down.
OCU in the Lavra: When a recording replaces the choir
Parishioners have been pushed out of the Lavra. The monks are barred from the churches. But there is room for a handful of OCU “monks.”
Sviatohirsk murder no one is allowed to talk about
Logic suggests that Zelensky was informed about the monk’s murder that very day.
Sviatohirsk Lavra tragedy: A confession of faith or not?
The killers came to the monastery and, after hearing the words “Glory to our Lord God” in response, began to kill. What matters is that the victims were given a choice: they could give the “right” answer and escape death.
Have the talking points on the Sviatohirsk murder already been rolled out?
Espreso gives viewers the unmistakable impression that nothing particularly terrible happened – and that no one should feel too sorry for the “Moscow Patriarchate monks.”
Why are a rabbi and an exarch pleading for corruption suspects?
The rabbi and the exarch are both highly intelligent men and cannot fail to understand that their actions are dealing a serious blow to their reputations. Yet they still went to court. Why?