President, Church and the 'Ministry of Disunification"

Volodymyr Zelensky. Photo: Bigmir

The plan contains many expressive theses, but we would like to focus on two:
• The intention to create the "Ministry of Ukrainians’ Unification";
• The statement that the UOC (Ukrainian Orthodox Church) is a "Moscow Church" and that its time has ended.

At first glance, these theses may seem unrelated, but they are not.

We don't know whether the creation of yet another ministry will help unite Ukrainians, but there is no doubt that our country desperately needs such unity. Therefore, the President's efforts in this direction can only be welcomed.

But how can one simultaneously proclaim a large part of these "unified" Ukrainians as (once again) accomplices of terrorists and enemies of the people?

After all, representatives of the authorities have repeatedly stated that the UOC counts 5-6 million believers. As of today, that is a quarter of Ukraine's population.

How can one, with the left hand, "unite" Ukrainians, and with the right hand, divide them into categories? What kind of "unity" can this be? Basic logic suggests that this is nothing more than disunion, which is murderous in a time of war. In other words, by declaring one thing, the government is effectively producing the exact opposite.

How can one not recall George Orwell's famous novel “1984’, where there are:
• The Ministry of Truth, responsible for disinformation;
• The Ministry of Peace, responsible for conducting military operations;
• The Ministry of Love, responsible for identifying and eliminating people disloyal to the regime, and so on.

The thing is, Orwell wrote a cautionary novel, aimed against any forms of totalitarianism, whereas Ukraine is a democratic rule-of-law state. And we can’t have anything in common with Orwell's world.

Or can we?

Read also

Portrait of the “сonscience of the nation”

Shevchuk waxes eloquent about the uniqueness of the Ukrainian nation and the value of human life – while supporting the sweeping mobilization that is grinding that very nation down.

OCU in the Lavra: When a recording replaces the choir

Parishioners have been pushed out of the Lavra. The monks are barred from the churches. But there is room for a handful of OCU “monks.”

Sviatohirsk murder no one is allowed to talk about

Logic suggests that Zelensky was informed about the monk’s murder that very day.

Sviatohirsk Lavra tragedy: A confession of faith or not?

The killers came to the monastery and, after hearing the words “Glory to our Lord God” in response, began to kill. What matters is that the victims were given a choice: they could give the “right” answer and escape death.

Have the talking points on the Sviatohirsk murder already been rolled out?

Espreso gives viewers the unmistakable impression that nothing particularly terrible happened – and that no one should feel too sorry for the “Moscow Patriarchate monks.”

Why are a rabbi and an exarch pleading for corruption suspects?

The rabbi and the exarch are both highly intelligent men and cannot fail to understand that their actions are dealing a serious blow to their reputations. Yet they still went to court. Why?