Why Dumenko called for Patriarch Kirill to be put on trial
Epifaniy Dumenko. Photo: OCU
On May 24, the OCU’s so-called “Council of Bishops” called on the Phanar and other Churches to depose the primate of the ROC for promoting the “Russian World” and blessing the war in Ukraine. Why did it do this, and why now?
After receiving the Tomos in 2019, many Ukrainian patriots were outraged that Sergei Dumenko had begun commemorating Patriarch Kirill during “services.” Dumenko responded that commemorating the primates of the Churches was one of the requirements of the Tomos and that he did not want to violate its provisions.
But in the second month of the war with Russia, Dumenko stopped commemorating Patriarch Kirill, thereby violating the provisions of the Tomos. The reason is obvious – the inevitable anger of Ukrainian society, for which the ROC primate had become one of the enemy figures. The chief justification used by those seizing UOC churches at the time was “praying for Kirill.”
Thus, Dumenko managed to kill several birds with one stone:
• he "legitimized" his violation of the Tomos norms;
• he showed society that, unlike the UOC, he was “patriotic” enough not to commemorate the “enemy” patriarch;
• he pleased the Phanar, which was effectively locked in a conflict with the ROC.
As the saying goes, nothing personal – just business.
Read also
Can we judge those who joined the OCU from the military commissariat?
There are many known cases where priests and deacons of the UOC, detained by TRC officers, were offered a simple way to secure their release – to switch to the OCU. Most refused.
On Rivne Metropolitan's excuse for service in Jerusalem
If today we consider it possible to make excuses for concelebrating with the ROC, what will we have to justify tomorrow?
UOC isn’t banned, just ‘de-Russified’? Neither was UGCC under Stalin then
By Shevchuk’s logic, Stalin never banned the UGCC or curtailed freedom of conscience – he merely “freed” the souls of the Uniates from Bandera ideology.
A dip in the Jordan on “one – two – three”
Well-known OCU blogger in “holy orders” Oleksii Filiuk has come up with his own theological formula on the banks of the Jordan. It goes like this: “One – two – three.”
On the situation at Sviatohirsk Lavra
After the killing of Monk Varsonofiy and the attempted murder of two other monastery residents, many patriots claimed that the crime had been committed by enemy saboteurs.
You’re happy, aren’t you? Then why change anything?
The KIIS poll seems to be telling the U.S. authorities: Look, Ukrainians like living this way. They’re not just satisfied with everything – they’re happy. They don’t need peace, so why change anything?